| VIII. Documentary
          MatterConsequent upon the
 foregoing remarks on
          the thirty-
 nine articles
——————— Letter of Four College TutorsTo the Editor of the Tracts for the Times
{359} Sir,—Our attention having been called to No. 90 in the
          Series of "Tracts for the Times by Members of the University of
          Oxford," of which you are the Editor, the impression produced on
          our minds by its contents is of so painful a character, that we feel
          it our duty to intrude ourselves briefly on your attention. This publication is entitled "Remarks on certain Passages in
          the Thirty-nine Articles;" and, as these Articles are appointed
          by the Statutes of the University to be the text-book for Tutors in
          their theological teaching, we hope that the situations we hold in our
          respective Colleges will secure us from the charge of presumption in
          thus coming forward to address you. The Tract has in our apprehension a highly dangerous tendency from
          its suggesting that certain very important errors of the Church of
          Rome are not condemned by the Articles of the Church of England; for
          instance, that those Articles do not contain any condemnation of the
          doctrines, 1, of Purgatory; 2, of Pardons; 3, of the worship and
          adoration of Images and Relics; 4, of the Invocation of Saints; 5, of
          the Mass, as they are taught authoritatively by the Church of Rome,
          but only of certain absurd practices and opinions which intelligent
          Romanists repudiate as much as we do. It is intimated, moreover, that the Declaration prefixed to the
          Articles, so far as it has any weight at all, sanctions this mode of
          interpreting them; as it is one which takes them in their
          "literal and grammatical sense," and does not "affix
          any new sense" to them. The Tract would thus appear to us to have a tendency {360} to
          mitigate, beyond what charity requires, and to the prejudice of the
          pure truth of the Gospel, the very serious differences which separate
          the Church of Rome from our own; and to shake the confidence of the
          less learned members of the Church of England in the spiritual
          character of her formularies and teaching. We readily admit the necessity of allowing that liberty in
          interpreting the formularies of our Church, which has been advocated
          by many of its most learned Bishops and other eminent divines; but
          this Tract puts forward new and startling views as to the extent to
          which that liberty may be carried. For if we are right in our
          apprehension of the Author's meaning, we are at a loss to see what
          security would remain, were his principles generally recognized, that
          the most plainly erroneous doctrines and practices of the Church of
          Rome might not be inculcated in the lecture-rooms of the University
          and from the pulpits of our Churches. In conclusion we venture to call your attention to the impropriety
          of such questions being treated in an anonymous publication, and to
          express an earnest hope that you may be authorized to make known the
          writer's name. Considering how very grave and solemn the whole subject
          is, we cannot help thinking, that both the Church and the University
          are entitled to ask that some person, besides the printer and
          publisher of the Tract, should acknowledge himself as responsible for
          its contents. We are, Sir, your obedient, humble servants,T. T. CHURTON, M.A.,
 Vice-Principal and Tutor of Brasen-Nose College.
 H. B. WILSON, B.D.,
 Senior Tutor of St. John's College.
 JOHN GRIFFITHS, M.A.,
 Subwarden and Tutor of Wadham College.
 A. C. TAIT,
 Fellow and Senior Tutor of Balliol College.
 OXFORD, March 8, 1841. {361} Top | Contents | Works
          | Home 
 Answer by the Author of Tract
          No. 90to the above Letter
The Editor of the Tracts for the Times begs to acknowledge the
          receipt of the very courteous communication of Mr. Churton, Mr.
          Wilson, Mr. Griffiths, and Mr. Tait, and receives it as expressing the
          opinion of persons for whom he has much respect, and whose names carry
          great weight. To the Rev. T. T. CHURTON, &c. March 8, 1841. {362} Top | Contents | Works
          | Home 
 At a meeting of the
          Vice-Chancellor, Heads of Houses, andProctors, in the Delegates' Room, March 15, 1841
Considering that it is enjoined in the STATUTES of this University,
          (TIT. iii. SECT. 2. TIT.
          ix. SECT. ii. § 3. SECT.
          v. § 3), that every student shall be instructed and examined in the
          Thirty-nine Articles, and shall subscribe to them; considering also
          that a Tract has recently appeared, dated from Oxford, and entitled
          "Remarks on certain Passages in the Thirty-nine Articles,"
          being No. 90 of the Tracts for the Times, a series of Anonymous
          Publications purporting to be written by members of the University,
          but which are in no way sanctioned by the University itself; RESOLVED, That modes of interpretation such
          as are suggested in the said Tract, evading rather than explaining the
          sense of the Thirty-nine Articles, and reconciling subscription to
          them with the adoption of errors, which they were designed to
          counteract, defeat the object, and are inconsistent with the due
          observance of the above-mentioned STATUTES. P. WYNTER,Vice-Chancellor.
 [Promulgated March 16, 1841.] {363} Top | Contents | Works
          | Home 
 Letter of the Author of Tract
          No. 90to the Vice-Chancellor
MR. VICE-CHANCELLOR.—I
          write this to inform you respectfully, that I am the author, and have
          the sole responsibility of the Tract, on which the Hebdomadal Board
          has just now expressed an opinion; and that I have not given my name
          hitherto, under the belief that it was desired I should not do so. I hope it will not surprise you if I say, that my opinion remains
          unchanged of the truth and honesty of the principle maintained in the
          Tract, and of the necessity of putting it forth. At the same time I am prompted by my feelings to express my deep
          consciousness, that everything I attempt might be done in a better
          spirit, and in a better way; and, while I am sincerely sorry for the
          trouble and anxiety I have given to the members of the Board, I beg to
          return my thanks to them for an act, which, even though founded on
          misapprehension, may be made as profitable to myself, as it is
          religiously and charitably intended. I say all this with great sincerity, and am,Mr. VICE-CHANCELLOR,
 Your obedient servant,
 JOHN HENRY NEWMAN.
 Oriel College, March 16, 1841. Top | Contents | Works
          | Home 
 Newman Reader  Works of John Henry NewmanCopyright © 2007 by The National Institute for Newman Studies. All rights reserved.
 |