Sermon 7. Faith and the World
"Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be
unpunished: but the seed of the righteous shall be delivered."
Prov. xi. 21.
{78} WHEN we hear speak of the wicked, we are apt to think that men of
abandoned lives and unprincipled conduct, cruel, crafty, or profligate
men, can alone be meant. This obtains almost universally; we think
that evil, in any sufficient sense of the word, is something external
to us, and at a distance. Thus in the case of children, when they hear
of bad men and wicked men, they have no conception that evil can
really be near them. They fancy, with a fearful curiosity, something
which they have not seen, something foreign and monstrous, as if
brought over the seas, or the production of another sphere; though, in
truth, evil, and in its worst and most concentrated shape, is born
with them, lives within them, is not subdued except by a supernatural
gift from God, and is still in them, even when God's grace has brought
it under. And so, when we grow up, whether we are thrown upon the
world or not, we commonly do not understand that what Scripture says
of sin, of its odiousness {79} and its peril, applies to us. The world
itself, even though we see it, appears not to be the world; that is,
not the world which Scripture speaks of. We do not discern, we do not
detect, the savour of its sinfulness; its ways are pleasant to us; and
what Scripture says of wickedness, and of misery as attending on it,
does not, as we think, apply to the world we see.
And hence it is, that when we read, as in the text, of the short
triumph and the overthrow of wickedness, when we read that
"though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be
unpunished," we have a picture brought before us of some
overbearing tyranny, or some perfidious conspiracy, or some bold and
avowed banding against religion, some event of a generation or a
century, and nothing short of it. And such specimens of evil doubtless
are especially intended by the sacred writer; still, after all, much
more is included in his meaning, much which is ordinary, much which we
see before our eyes.
Can it indeed be otherwise? Is not the world in itself evil? Is it
an accident, is it an occasion, is it but an excess, or a crisis, or a
complication of circumstances, which constitutes its sinfulness? or,
rather, is it not one of our three great spiritual enemies, at all
times, and under all circumstances and all changes, ungodly,
unbelieving, seducing, and anti-christian? Surely we must grant it to
be so. Why else in Baptism do we vow to wage war against it? Why else
does Scripture speak of it in the terms which we know so well, if we
will but attend to them? St. James says, that "the friendship of
the world is enmity with God," [James iv. 4.] so that
"whosoever {80} will be a friend of the world is the enemy of
God." And St. Paul speaks of "walking according to the
course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air,
the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience;"
[Eph. ii. 2.] and exhorts us not to be "conformed to this
world," but to be "transformed by the renewing of our
mind;" [Rom. xii. 2.] and he says that Christ "gave Himself
for our sins, that He might deliver us from this present evil
world." [Gal. i. 4.] In like manner St. John says, "Love not
the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love
the world, the love of the Father is not in him." [1 John ii.
15.] Let us be quite sure, then, that that confederacy of evil which
Scripture calls the world, that conspiracy against Almighty God of
which Satan is the secret instigator, is something wider, and more
subtle, and more ordinary, than mere cruelty, or craft, or profligacy;
it is that very world in which we are; it is not a certain body or
party of men, but it is human society itself. This it is which is our
greatest enemy; and this it is of which the text in its fulness
speaks, when it says that "though hand join in hand, the wicked
shall not be unpunished." It is powerful at present, but in the
end it shall be overthrown; and then these its separate members
"shall not be unpunished," but "the seed of the
righteous shall be delivered."
Now I shall attempt an explanation of what may be supposed to be
meant in the text by "hand joining in hand," and of the
sense in which it is fulfilled in the course of human affairs in every
age. The one peculiar and characteristic sin of the world is this,
that whereas {81} God would have us live for the life to come, the world
would make us live for this life. This, I say, is the world's sin; it
lives for this life, not for the next. It takes, as the main scope of
human exertion, an end which God forbids; and consequently all that it
does becomes evil, because directed to a wrong end.
This is a thing which seems easy to say, but which should be
steadily considered. In this respect the temptations of the world
differ from temptations of the flesh. The flesh is not rational, nor
appeals to reason; but the world reasons. The works of the flesh are
such as St. Paul describes them,—variance, hatred, murders,
adulteries, uncleanness, and drunkenness. Pride, cruelty, wrath,
revenge, obstinacy, sensuality, are works of the flesh. They are the
spontaneous fruit of the unrenewed mind, as thorns and thistles are
the natural growth of the earth. But the case is different as regards
the world. The world has many sins, but its peculiar offence is that
of daring to reason contrary to God's Word and will. It puts wrong
aims before itself, and acts towards them. It goes wrong as if on
principle, and prefers its own way of viewing things to God's way.
When Eve saw that the forbidden fruit was good for food, she was
tempted through the flesh; and when the serpent said, "Ye shall
not surely die," he used the temptation proper to the world—false
reason.
Now you will see this by taking a survey of the world, and seeing
how and why it disobeys God. God, in Scripture, says one thing; the
world says another. God says that we should live for the life to come;
the world says that we should live for this life. How is it {82} able to
say so? what are the arguments it uses? Let us consider.
Men seem made for this world; this is what prevails on them to
neglect the next world: they think they have reason for concluding,
they think they see, that this world is the world for which they are
to labour, and to which they are to devote their faculties. And
therefore they persist in denying that they must live for the next
world. It is not that they profess to run counter to God's Word, but
they deny that He has said that they must live directly for the next
world. As the Israelites did not avowedly cast off the God of Abraham
when they worshipped the golden calf, but professed to worship Him
under that symbol, so men generally, when they pursue this world as
their supreme good, and as their god, deny that they are
disowning their Lord and Maker, but maintain that He wishes them to
worship Him by means of and in this world.
Now these are the sort of considerations which seduce them to think
that this world is all in all:—
1. For instance, there are a number of faculties and talents which
seem only to exist in this world, and to be impossible in another.
Consider the varieties of mental gifts which are in active exercise on
all sides of us, and you will see what I mean; such as talent for
business, or talent for the useful arts, mechanical talent. Or, again,
consider the talents which go to make up a great warrior. They seem as
if evidently made for this world, and this world only. If such ability
is not to be used, it may be asked, why is it given? If a person lives
only for the next world, what is the use of it? {83} Our aim then, they
say, must be an aim of this life, our end of action must be in this
world, because our talents point that way. Talents are not necessary
for religion, talents are not necessary for preparing for the life to
come; yet they are given, therefore they are given for this life. Thus
men argue: I do not say that they bring out their full meaning in
words; but this is the argument latent in their minds. They say or
think that if religion disowns the wisdom of this world; if it
disowns, as its real and true ground, power, and rank, and might, and
knowledge, and ability,—which it does; then, all these things may
disown religion, do not belong to religion, need not aim at religion.
It parts with them, they part with it. Religion, therefore (they say),
is not for this world. It is a private thing for each man's own
conscience, but not for society, not for acting upon on a large scale.
And this, both because man has faculties which religion does not deign
to make its instruments; and also because these faculties do not exist
beyond this life, and therefore, if they are to be employed, must be
employed here.
2. Another consideration of the same kind, which is adapted to
influence men of this world in the same direction, if they give their
minds to consider the matter, is the existence of national character.
This seems to them to be a providential mark of what this world is
intended to be. The character of one individual may be
accidental, and may arise from his own caprice or wilfulness; but when
a whole multitude are one and the same, this cannot arise from
themselves, it must arise from their very nature, it must be a token
of {84} the will of God. That character, they say, whatever it is, must be
pleasing to God. Now one nation is manly, and another is brave but
cruel, and a third sagacious, and a fourth energetic and busy. These
then, it is argued, are the qualities of mind for which this life is
intended. Where was there ever a religious nation? or, at least, how
is it possible, in the nature of things, that nations, differing as
they do, and so complete in their differences, should have been
intended for one form or creed? Religion, then, is for the next world,
not for this. No (thus men seem to proceed), energy and activity,
enterprise, adventure, rivalry, and invention,—war, politics, and
trade,—these are what men are made for here; not for faith, fear,
humiliation, prayer, self-discipline, penance, tenderness of
conscience, sanctity. It is very well if individuals feel themselves
called this way; but it is a private matter for themselves, not to be
urged on others. Or again, if we look at the religion of different
men, one developes one set of ideas, another another; one adopts a
strict creed, another is free and bold. All religions then are matters
of opinion, because they are matters of disposition and habit.
3. I have spoken of nations, because the argument then can be made
to look specious; but men generally apply it to the case of
individuals. They go into the world, and they find individuals of this
or that character, and not religious; and hence they argue that
religion is but a theory, because it is not on the face of society.
This is what they call seeing life and knowing the world, and it leads
them to despise strict principle and religious conduct as
narrow-minded. They say that religion is {85} very well for a domestic
circle, but will not do for the world; for they take men as facts, as
they might take the materials of the physical world, stones or
vegetables; as if they were what they were, and could not be
otherwise; and as one cannot change the elements, but must take them
for what they are, and use them, so they think we ought to deal with
human beings. And as a person would be called a theorist, who
cherished certain ideas about the natural world, to which the facts of
that world did not answer, so they think a man a mere dreamer, who
says that men ought not to be what they confessedly are; who comes to
them with a doctrine which is above them, refuses to deal with them as
he finds them, and tries to raise them, and change them, and to make
them what they are not. As they would think a man a madman who waited
for rivers to have done flowing, or mountains to make way before him,
so they think it obstinate, impracticable, perverse, and almost
insane, to run counter to the natural man, to thwart his wishes, to
condemn his opinions, and to insist on his submitting to a rule
foreign to him. Great philosophers have said, that in the case of the
material creation we overcome nature by yielding to it, and because
this is true of matter, the world would have it in the same sense true
of mind.
4. Another consideration which the world urges in its warfare
against religion, as I have already implied, is, that religion is
unnatural. It is objected (what indeed cannot be denied, and is almost
a truism) that religion does not bring the elementary and existing
nature of man to its highest perfection, but thwarts and impairs {86} it,
and provides for a second and new nature. It is said, and truly, that
religion treats the body hardly, and is severe with the soul. How
different is the world, which conceives that the first object of life
is to treat our inferior nature indulgently, that all methods of
living are right which do this, and all wrong which do not! Hence men
lay it down, that wealth is the measure of all good, and the end of
life; for a state of wealth may be described as a state of ease and
comfort to body and mind. They say that every act of civil government
is wrong, which does not tend to what they thus consider to be man's
happiness; that utility and expedience, or, in other words, whatever
tends to produce wealth, is the only rule on which laws should be
framed; that what tends to higher objects is not useful or expedient;
that higher objects are a mere dream; that the only thing substantial
is this life, and the only wisdom, to cherish and enjoy it. And they
are so obstinate in this their evil view of things, that they will not
let other people take their own view and rest in it; but are bent on
making all men (what they call) happy in their way. In their plans of
social and domestic economy, their projects of education, their mode
of treating the poor, the one object which they think sufficient for
happiness is, that men should have the necessaries of life according
to their condition. On the other hand, they think that religion in all
its duties clashes with this life, and is therefore unnatural.
Almsgiving they think the virtue of a barbarous or half-civilized or
badly-managed community. Fasting and watching are puerile and
contemptible, for such practices interfere with nature, which {87} prompts
us to eat and sleep. Prayer again is a mere indolence. It is better,
they say, to put the shoulder to the wheel, than to spend time in
wishing it to move. Again, making a stand for particular doctrines is
thought unnecessary and unmeaning, as if there were any excellence or
merit in believing this rather than that, or believing any thing at
all.
These are some of the arguments on which the world relies, in
defending the interests of this life against those of the next. It
says, that the constitution of our body and the powers of our mind
tend towards an end short of the next life; and therefore that
religion, or the thought of the next world, is unnatural. I answer by
admitting that religion is in this sense unnatural; but I maintain
that Christ came to bring in a higher nature into this world of men,
and that this could not be done except by interfering with the nature
which originally belongs to it. Where the spiritual system runs
counter to the natural, the natural must give way. God has graciously
willed to bring us to heaven; to practise a heavenly life on earth,
certainly, is a thing above earth. It is like trying to execute some
high and refined harmony on an insignificant instrument. In attempting
it, that instrument would be taxed beyond its powers, and would be
sacrificed to great ideas beyond itself. And so, in a certain sense,
this life, and our present nature, is sacrificed for heaven and the
new creature; that while our outward man perishes, our inward man may
be renewed day by day.
If, indeed, men will urge that religion is against nature, as an
objection to religion, certainly we must become infidels at once; for
can any thing be so marvellously {88} and awfully beyond nature, both the
nature of man and the nature of God, as that the Eternal Son of God
should take flesh and be born of a virgin, and suffer and die on the
cross, and rise again? Let us cease, then, to fear this taunt, that
religion makes us lead an unnatural or rather supernatural life,
seeing it has no force, except it withal persuade us to disown our
Saviour, who for us took on Him another nature not His own, and was in
the economy of grace what by His Divine generation from the Father He
could not be.
5. But to proceed: the strongest argument which the world uses in
its favour, is the actual success of its experiment in cultivating the
natural faculties of body and mind; for success seems a fresh mark of
God's will, over and above the tendencies of nature. This is what
influences men most especially to neglect the words of Scripture. Any
thing that is used for an end unsuited to it is likely to fail; but
human nature, when used for this world, does not fail, but does its
work well, and therefore it seems as if it ought so to be used. For
instance, we argue that a certain animal is the work of God; why?
because its parts fit in together and sustain one another. We bring it
as a proof of design, a proof that it is made by God, and does not
come of chance, that its teeth and its claws are fitted to its nature
and habits, and to each other. Now human society, or this world our
enemy, seems in like manner to bear about it marks of design, and
therefore to come from God. Enter the mixed multitude of men, and see
how they go on. Men may or may not have the fear of God before their
eyes, yet they seem to go on equally well either way. Each has his
{89} own
occupation, his own place; he may be an irreligious and immoral man, a
scoffer, or covetous, or heartless, or he may be serious and correct
in his conduct, yet none of these things interfere much one way or the
other with the development of our social state, the formation of
communities, the provisions for mutual protection, the interchange of
good offices, and the general intercourse of man with man.
Punctuality, honesty, business-like despatch, perseverance, sobriety,
friendliness, trust in each other, steady cooperation, these are the
sort of virtues which seem sufficient for carrying on the great
empires of the world; what a man's character is besides, seems nothing
to the purpose. Each nation testifies to each, north to south, and
east to west, as to what is enough, and what is required, and
Christianity is not included in the list of requisites. East and west,
north and south, are of different religions,—here there is no
agreement; the form of religion may be this or may be that, and the
world goes on the same; but the value of such qualities as I have
named is acknowledged every where. If these did not constitute the
true excellence of our nature, it is argued, they would not be enough
to live by. No vital part can be wanting in the world, because, in
fact, it has life.
I am obliged to state this in an abstract way, and cannot proceed
to instances, because I should become familiar. But let any one betake
himself to the world, and go through but one day in it; let him
consider the course of occurrences through which he passes, only by
taking a journey and passing day or night among strangers, or at an
inn; and he will recognize what I {90} mean. He will understand what this
argument is, which the very face of society presents; viz. that
religion is not needed for this world, and therefore is of no great
importance.
Now, let it be observed, what I have already implied, men of the
world do not deny the existence and power of God. No; they only hold
this—(I do not mean in words, but implicitly)—they hold, I say,
not that there is not an Almighty Ruler, whose subjects they are, but
they deny in their hearts all that is meant by religion, or religious
service; they deny their duty towards God; they deny His personal
existence, and their subjection to Him. Yes; and if they are obliged
at any time to own the existence of religious duty, then they say, to
get rid of the subject, in an insincere way, lightly, heartlessly,
sometimes scoffingly, that the best kind of religion is "to do
their duty in this world," that this is the true worship of God;
in other words, that the pursuit of money, of credit, of power, that
the gratification of self, and the worship of self, is doing their
duty. This unbelief you see in a variety of shapes. For instance, many
persons openly defend the aim at rising in the world, and speak in
applause of an honourable ambition; as if the prizes of this world
were from heaven, and the steps of this world's ladder were the ascent
of Angels which Jacob saw. Others, again, consider that their duty
lies simply in this,—in making money for their families. The soldier
thinks that fighting for his King is his sufficient religion; and the
statesman, even when he is most blameless, that serving his country is
religion. God's service, as such, as distinct from the {91} service of this
world, is in no sense recognized. Faith, hope, love, devotion, are
mere names; some visible idol is taken as the substitute for God.
And will God Almighty thus be defrauded of what is due to Him? Will
He allow the seductions of this world's sophistry, against which He
has Himself warned us, to excuse us in His sight at the last day? Will
it be sufficient to acquit us at His judgment-seat for neglecting His
Word, that we have trusted the world? for scoffing at faith, that we
have lived by sight? Will it compensate for neglecting the God and
Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, that we have been Pantheists? is not
this our very calling as Christians, to live by faith? If we do not,
it is mere trifling to call ourselves Christians at all. The world
promises that, if we trust it, we cannot go wrong. Why? because it is
so many—there are so many men in it; they must be right. This is
what it seems boldly to say,—"God cannot punish so many."
So it is, we know, in human law. The magistrate never can punish a
very great number of the community at once; he is obliged to let the
multitude of culprits escape him, and he makes examples;—and this is
what we cannot help fancying God will do. We do not allow ourselves to
take in the idea that He can, and that He has said He will, punish a
thousand as easily as one. What the poor and ignorant man, who lives
irreligiously, professes, is what all really profess. He, when taxed
with neglect of religion, says that "he is as good as his
neighbours," he speaks out; he speaks abruptly, but he does but
say what multitudes feel who do not say it. They think that this world
is too great an evil for God to {92} punish; or rather that therefore it is
not an evil, because it is a great one. They cannot compass the idea
that God should allow so great an evil to exist, as the world would
be, if it is evil; and therefore, since He does allow it, it is not an
evil. In vain does Scripture assure them that it is an evil, though
God allows it. In vain does the whole Psalter, from beginning to the
end, proclaim and protest that the world is against the truth, and
that the saints must suffer. In vain do Apostles tell us, that the
world lieth in wickedness; in vain does Christ Himself declare, that
broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there be that
go in thereat. In vain do Prophets tell us, that in the end the saints
shall possess the kingdom,—implying they do not possess it now. In
vain is the vast judgment of the Deluge; in vain the instant death of
the first-born in Egypt, and of the hosts of Sennacherib. No, we will
not believe; the words of the Tempter ring in our ears,—"Ye
shall not surely die!" and we stake our eternal interests on
sight and reason, rather than on the revealed Word of God.
O how miserable in that day, when the dead bones rise from their
graves, and the millions who once lived are summoned before their
Omnipotent Judge, whose breath is a fiery stream, and whose voice is
like the sound of many waters! How vain to call upon the rocks to fall
on us; or to attempt to hide ourselves among the trees of the garden,
and to make our brother's sin cover our own; when we are in His
presence, who is every where at once, and is as fully and entirely our
God and Judge, as if there were no other creature but each of us in
the whole world! Why will we not learn here, what then {93} to a certainty
we shall discover, that number is not strength? Never was a greater
fallacy than to suppose that the many must necessarily be stronger
than the few; on the contrary, power is ever concentrated and one, in
order to be power. God is one. The heathen raged, the people imagined
a vain thing; the kings of the earth and the rulers joined hands and
took counsel together; and Christ was one. Such is the Divine rule.
"There is one body and one Spirit," and "one
hope," and "one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and
Father of all." No; the number of the wicked will be but an
increase of their misery; they will but crowd their prison.
Let us then leave the world, manifold and various as it is; let us
leave it to follow its own devices, and let us turn to the living and
true God, who has revealed Himself to us in Jesus Christ. Let us be
sure that He is more true than the whole world, though with one voice
all its inhabitants were to speak against Him. And if we doubt where
the truth lies, let us pray to Him to reveal it to us; let us pray Him
to give us humility, that we may seek aright; honesty, that we may
have no concealed aims; love, that we may desire the truth; and faith,
that we may accept it. So that when the end comes, and the multitudes
who have joined hands in evil are punished, we may be of those who, in
the words of the text, are "delivered." Let us put off all
excuses, all unfairness and insincerity, all trifling with our
consciences, all self-deception, all delay of repentance. Let us be
filled with one wish,—to please God; and if we have this, I say it
confidently, we shall no longer be {94} deceived by this world, however
loud it speaks, and however plausibly it argues, as if God were with
it, for we shall "have an unction from the Holy One," and
shall "know all things."
Top | Contents | Works
| Home
Newman Reader — Works of John Henry Newman
Copyright © 2007 by The National Institute for Newman Studies. All rights reserved.
|