|  Discourse 10. Faith and Private Judgment
{192} WHEN we consider the beauty, the majesty, the completeness, the
          resources, the consolations, of the Catholic Religion, it may strike
          us with wonder, my brethren, that it does not convert the multitude of
          those who come in its way. Perhaps you have felt this surprise
          yourselves; especially those of you who have been recently converted,
          and can compare it, from experience, with those religions which the
          millions of this country choose instead of it. You know from
          experience how barren, unmeaning, and baseless those religions are;
          what poor attractions they have, and how little they have to say for
          themselves. Multitudes, indeed, are of no religion at all; and you may
          not be surprised that those who cannot even bear the thought of God,
          should not feel drawn to His Church; numbers, too, hear very little
          about Catholicism, or a great deal of abuse and calumny against it,
          and you may not be surprised that they do not all at once become
          Catholics; but what may fairly surprise those who enjoy the fulness of
          Catholic blessings is, that those who see the Church ever so
          distantly, who see even gleams or the faint lustre of her {193} majesty,
          nevertheless should not be so far attracted by what they see as to
          seek to see more,—should not at least put themselves in the way to
          be led on to the Truth, which of course is not ordinarily recognised
          in its Divine authority except by degrees. Moses, when he saw the
          burning bush, turned aside to see "that great sight";
          Nathaniel, though he thought no good could come out of Nazareth, at
          least followed Philip to Christ, when Philip said to him, "Come
          and see"; but the multitudes about us see and hear, in some
          measure, surely,—many in ample measure,—and yet are not persuaded
          thereby to see and hear more, are not moved to act upon their
          knowledge. Seeing they see not, and hearing they hear not; they are
          contented to remain as they are; they are not drawn to inquire, or at
          least not drawn on to embrace. Many explanations may be given of this difficulty; I will proceed
          to suggest to you one, which will sound like a truism, but yet has a
          meaning in it. Men do not become Catholics, because they have not
          faith. Now you may ask me, how this is saying more than that men do
          not believe the Catholic Church because they do not believe it;
          which is saying nothing at all. Our Lord, for instance, says, "He
          who cometh to Me shall not hunger, and he who believeth in Me shall
          never thirst";—to believe then and to come are the same thing.
          If they had faith, of course they would join the Church, for the very
          meaning, the very exercise of faith, is joining the Church. But I mean
          something more than this: faith is a state of mind, it is a particular
          mode of thinking and acting, which is {194} exercised, always indeed towards
          God, but in very various ways. Now I mean to say, that the multitude
          of men in this country have not this habit or character of mind. We
          could conceive, for instance, their believing in their own religions,
          even if they did not believe in the Church; this would be faith,
          though a faith improperly directed; but they do not believe even their
          own religions; they do not believe in anything at all. It is a
          definite defect in their minds: as we might say that a person had not
          the virtue of meekness, or of liberality, or of prudence, quite
          independently of this or that exercise of the virtue, so there is such
          a religious virtue as faith, and there is such a defect as the absence
          of it. Now I mean to say that the great mass of men in this country
          have not this particular virtue called faith, have not this virtue at
          all. As a man might be without eyes or without hands, so they are
          without faith; it is a distinct want or fault in their soul; and what
          I say is, that  since they have not this faculty of religious belief,
          no wonder they do not embrace that, which cannot really be embraced
          without it. They do not believe any teaching at all in any true sense;
          and therefore they do not believe the Church in particular. Now, in the first place, what is faith? it is assenting to a
          doctrine as true, which we do not see, which we cannot prove, because
          God says it is true, who cannot lie. And further than this, since God
          says it is true, not with His own voice, but by the voice of His
          messengers, it is assenting to what man says, not simply viewed as a
          man, but to what he is commissioned to {195} declare, as a messenger,
          prophet, or ambassador from God. In the ordinary course of this world
          we account things true either because we see them, or because we can
          perceive that they follow and are deducible from what we do see; that
          is, we gain truth by sight or by reason, not by faith. You will say
          indeed, that we accept a number of things which we cannot prove or
          see, on the word of others; certainly, but then we accept what they
          say only as the word of man; and we have not commonly that absolute
          and unreserved confidence in them, which nothing can shake. We know
          that man is open to mistake, and we are always glad to find some
          confirmation of what he says, from other quarters, in any important
          matter; or we receive his information with negligence and unconcern,
          as something of little consequence, as a matter of opinion; or, if we
          act upon it, it is as a matter of prudence, thinking it best and
          safest to do so. We take his word for what it is worth, and we use it
          either according to our necessity, or its probability. We keep the
          decision in our own hands, and reserve to ourselves the right of
          reopening the question whenever we please. This is very different from
          Divine faith; he who believes that God is true, and that this is His
          word, which He has committed to man, has no doubt at all. He is as
          certain that the doctrine taught is true, as that God is true; and he
          is certain, because God is true, because God has spoken,
          not because he sees its truth or can prove its truth. That is, faith
          has two peculiarities;—it is most certain, decided, positive,
          immovable {196} in its assent, and it gives this assent not because it sees
          with eye, or sees with the reason, but because it receives the tidings
          from one who comes from God. This is what faith was in the time of the Apostles, as no one can
          deny; and what it was then, it must be now, else it ceases to be the
          same thing. I say, it certainly was this in the Apostles' time, for
          you know they preached to the world that Christ was the Son of God,
          that He was born of a Virgin, that He had ascended on high, that He
          would come again to judge all, the living and the dead. Could the
          world see all this? could it prove it? how then were men to receive
          it? why did so many embrace it? on the word of the Apostles, who were,
          as their powers showed, messengers from God. Men were told to submit
          their reason to a living authority. Moreover, whatever an Apostle
          said, his converts were bound to believe; when they entered the
          Church, they entered it in order to learn. The Church was their
          teacher; they did not come to argue, to examine, to pick and choose,
          but to accept whatever was put before them. No one doubts, no one can
          doubt this, of those primitive times. A Christian was bound to take
          without doubting all that the Apostles declared to be revealed; if the
          Apostles spoke, he had to yield an internal assent of his mind; it
          would not be enough to keep silence, it would not be enough not to
          oppose: it was not allowable to credit in a measure; it was not
          allowable to doubt. No; if a convert had his own private thoughts of
          what was {197} said, and only kept them to himself, if he made some secret
          opposition to the teaching, if he waited for further proof before he
          believed it, this would be a proof that he did not think the Apostles
          were sent from God to reveal His will; it would be a proof that he did
          not in any true sense believe at all. Immediate, implicit submission
          of the mind was, in the lifetime of the Apostles, the only, the
          necessary token of faith; then there was no room whatever for what is
          now called private judgment. No one could say: "I will choose my
          religion for myself, I will believe this, I will not believe that; I
          will pledge myself to nothing; I will believe just as long as I
          please, and no longer; what I believe today I will reject tomorrow, if
          I choose. I will believe what the Apostles have as yet said, but I
          will not believe what they shall say in time to come." No; either
          the Apostles were from God, or they were not; if they were, everything
          that they preached was to be believed by their hearers; if they were
          not, there was nothing for their hearers to believe. To believe a
          little, to believe more or less, was impossible; it contradicted the
          very notion of believing: if one part was to be believed, every part
          was to be believed; it was an absurdity to believe one thing and not
          another; for the word of the Apostles, which made the one true, made
          the other true too; they were nothing in themselves, they were all
          things, they were an infallible authority, as coming from God. The
          world had either to become Christian, or to let it alone; there was no
          room for private tastes and fancies, no room for private judgment.
          {198} Now surely this is quite clear from the nature of the case; but is
          also clear from the words of Scripture. "We give thanks to
          God," says St. Paul, "without ceasing, because when ye had
          received from us the word of hearing, which is of God, ye received it,
          not as the word of men, but (as it is indeed) the Word of God."
          Here you see St. Paul expresses what I have said above; that the Word
          comes from God, that it is spoken by men, that it must be received,
          not as man's word, but as God's word. So in another place he says:
          "He who despiseth these things, despiseth not man, but God, who
          hath also given in us His Holy Spirit". Our Saviour had made a
          like declaration already: "He that heareth you, heareth Me; and
          he that despiseth you, despiseth Me; and he that despiseth Me,
          despiseth Him that sent Me". Accordingly, St. Peter on the day of
          Pentecost said: "Men of Israel, hear these words, God hath
          raised up this Jesus, whereof we are witnesses. Let all
          the house of Israel know most certainly that God hath made this
          Jesus, whom you have crucified, both Lord and Christ." At another
          time he said: "We ought to obey God, rather than man; we are witnesses
          of these things, and so is the Holy Ghost, whom God has given
          to all who obey Him". And again: "He commanded us to preach
          to the people, and to testify that it is He (Jesus) who hath been
          appointed by God to be the Judge of the living and of the dead".
          And you know that the persistent declaration of the first preachers
          was: "Believe and thou shalt be saved": they do not say,
          "prove our doctrine by your own reason," {199} nor "wait till
          you see before you believe"; but, "believe without seeing
          and without proving, because our word is not our own, but God's
          word". Men might indeed use their reason in inquiring into the
          pretensions of the Apostles; they might inquire whether or not they
          did miracles; they might inquire whether they were predicted in the
          Old Testament as coming from God; but when they had ascertained this
          fairly in whatever way, they were to take all the Apostles said for
          granted without proof; they were to exercise their faith, they were to
          be saved by hearing. Hence, as you perhaps observed, St. Paul
          significantly calls the revealed doctrine "the word of
          hearing," in the passage I quoted; men came to hear, to accept,
          to obey, not to criticise what was said; and in accordance with this
          he asks elsewhere: "How shall they believe Him, whom they have
          not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? Faith cometh by
          hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ." Now, my dear brethren, consider, are not these two states or acts
          of mind quite distinct from each other;—to believe simply what a
          living authority tells you, and to take a book, such as Scripture, and
          to use it as you please, to master it, that is, to make yourself the
          master of it, to interpret it for yourself, and to admit just what you
          choose to see in it, and nothing more? Are not these two procedures
          distinct in this, that in the former you submit, in the latter you
          judge? At this moment I am not asking you which is the better, I am
          not asking whether this or that is practicable now, but are they not
          two ways of taking {200} up a doctrine, and not one? is not submission quite
          contrary to judging? Now, is it not certain that faith in the time of
          the Apostles consisted in submitting? and is it not certain that it
          did not consist in judging for one's self. It is in vain to say that
          the man who judges from the Apostles' writings, does submit to those
          writings in the first instance, and therefore has faith in them; else
          why should he refer to them at all? There is, I repeat, an essential
          difference between the act of submitting to a living oracle, and to
          his written words; in the former case there is no appeal from the
          speaker, in the latter the final decision remains with the reader.
          Consider how different is the confidence with which you report
          another's words in his presence and in his absence. If he be absent,
          you boldly say that he holds so and so, or said so and so; but let him
          come into the room in the midst of the conversation, and your tone is
          immediately changed. It is then, "I think I have heard you
          say something like this, or what I  took to be this"; or
          you modify considerably the statement or the fact to which you
          originally pledged him, dropping one-half of it for safety sake, or
          retrenching the most startling portions of it; and then after all you
          wait with some anxiety to see whether he will accept any portion of it
          at all. The same sort of process takes place in the case of the
          written document of a person now dead. I can fancy a man magisterially
          expounding St. Paul's Epistle to the Galatians or to the Ephesians,
          who would be better content with the writer's absence than his sudden
          reappearance among us; {201} lest the Apostle should take his own meaning
          out of his commentator's hands and explain it for himself. In a word,
          though he says he has faith in St. Paul's writings, he confessedly has
          no faith in St. Paul; and though he may speak much about truth as
          found in Scripture, he has no wish at all to be like one of these
          Christians whose names and deeds occur in it. I think I may assume that this virtue, which was exercised by the
          first Christians, is not known at all among Protestants now; or at
          least if there are instances of it, it is exercised towards those, I
          mean their own teachers and divines, who expressly disclaim that they
          are fit objects of it, and who exhort their people to judge for
          themselves. Protestants, generally speaking, have not faith, in the
          primitive meaning of that word; this is clear from what I have been
          saying, and here is a confirmation of it. If men believed now as they
          did in the times of the Apostles, they could not doubt nor change. No
          one can doubt whether a word spoken by God is to be believed; of
          course it is; whereas any one, who is modest and humble, may easily be
          brought to doubt of his own inferences and deductions. Since men
          now-a-days deduce from Scripture, instead of believing a teacher, you
          may expect to see them waver about; they will feel the force of their
          own deductions more strongly at one time than at another, they will
          change their minds about them, or perhaps deny them altogether;
          whereas this cannot be, while a man has faith, that is, belief that
          what a preacher says to him comes from God. This is what St. Paul
          especially insists on, telling us that {202} Apostles, prophets,
          evangelists, pastors, and teachers, are given us that "we may all
          attain to unity of faith," and, on the contrary, in order
          "that we be not as children tossed to and fro, and carried
          about by every gale of doctrine". Now, in matter of fact, do not
          men in this day change about in their religious opinions without any
          limit? Is not this, then, a proof that they have not that faith which
          the Apostles demanded of their converts? If they had faith, they would
          not change. Once believe that God has spoken, and you are sure He
          cannot unsay what He has already said; He cannot deceive; He cannot
          change; you have received it once for all; you will believe it ever. Such is the only rational, consistent account of faith; but so far
          are Protestants from professing it, that they laugh at the very notion
          of it. They laugh at the notion itself of men pinning their faith (as
          they express themselves) upon Pope or Council; they think it simply
          superstitious and narrow-minded, to profess to believe just what the
          Church believes, and to assent to whatever she will say in time to
          come on matters of doctrine. That is, they laugh at the bare notion of
          doing what Christians undeniably did in the time of the Apostles.
          Observe, they do not merely ask whether the Catholic Church has a
          claim to teach, has authority, has the gifts;—this is a reasonable
          question;—no, they think that the very state of mind which such a
          claim involves in those who admit it, namely, the disposition to
          accept without reserve or question, that this is slavish. They
          call it priestcraft to insist on this surrender of the reason, and
          superstition to {203} make it. That is, they quarrel with the very state of
          mind which all Christians had in the age of the Apostles; nor is there
          any doubt (who will deny it?) that those who thus boast of not being
          led blindfold, of judging for themselves, of believing just as much
          and just as little as they please, of hating dictation, and so forth,
          would have found it an extreme difficulty to hang on the lips of the
          Apostles, had they lived at their date, or rather would have simply
          resisted the sacrifice of their own liberty of thought, would have
          thought life eternal too dearly purchased at such a price, and would
          have died in their unbelief. And they would have defended themselves
          on the plea that it was absurd and childish to ask them to believe
          without proof, to bid them give up their education, and their
          intelligence, and their science, and in spite of all those
          difficulties which reason and sense find in the Christian doctrine, in
          spite of its mysteriousness, its obscurity, its strangeness, its
          unacceptableness, its severity, to require them to surrender
          themselves to the teaching of a few unlettered Galilæans, or a
          learned indeed but fanatical Pharisee. This is what they would have
          said then; and if so, is it wonderful they do not become Catholics
          now? The simple account of their remaining as they are, is, that they
          lack one thing,—they have not faith; it is a state of mind, it is a
          virtue, which they do not recognise to be praiseworthy, which they do
          not aim at possessing. What they feel now, my brethren, is just what both Jew and Greek
          felt before them in the time of the Apostles, and what the natural man
          has felt ever since. {204} The great and wise men of the day looked down
          upon faith, then as now, as if it were unworthy the dignity of human
          nature: "See your vocation, brethren, that there are not,"
          among you, "many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty,
          not many noble; but the foolish things of the world hath God chosen to
          confound the strong, and the mean things of the world, and the things
          that are contemptible, hath God chosen, and things that are not, that
          He might destroy the things that are, that no flesh might glory in His
          sight". Hence the same Apostle speaks of "the foolishness of
          preaching". Similar to this is what our Lord had said in His
          prayer to the Father: "I thank Thee, Father, Lord of heaven and
          earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent,
          and hast revealed them unto little ones". Now, is it not plain
          that men of this day have just inherited the feelings and traditions
          of these falsely wise and fatally prudent persons in our Lord's day?
          They have the same obstruction in their hearts to entering the
          Catholic Church, which Pharisees and Sophists had before them; it goes
          against them to believe her doctrine, not so much for want of evidence
          that she is from God, as because, if so, they shall have to submit
          their minds to living men, who have not their own cultivation or depth
          of intellect, and because they must receive a number of doctrines,
          whether they will or no, which are strange to their imagination and
          difficult to their reason. The very characteristic of the Catholic
          teaching and of the Catholic teacher is to them a preliminary
          objection to their becoming {205} Catholics, so great, as to throw into the
          shade any argument however strong, which is producible in behalf of
          the mission of those teachers and the origin of that teaching. In
          short, they have not faith. They have not in them the principle of faith; and I repeat, it is
          nothing to the purpose to urge that at least they firmly believe
          Scripture to be the Word of God. In truth, it is much to be feared
          that their acceptance of Scripture itself is nothing better than a
          prejudice or inveterate feeling impressed on them when they were
          children. A proof of it is this; that, while they profess to be so
          shocked at Catholic miracles, and are not slow to call them
          "lying wonders," they have no difficulty at all about
          Scripture narratives, which are quite as difficult to the reason as
          any miracles recorded in the history of the Saints. I have heard on
          the contrary of Catholics who have been startled at first reading in
          Scripture the narratives of the ark in the deluge, of the tower of
          Babel, of Balaam and Balac, of the Israelites' flight from Egypt and
          entrance into the promised land, and of Esau's and Saul's rejection;
          which the bulk of Protestants receive without any effort of mind. How,
          then, do these Catholics accept them? by faith. They say, "God is
          true, and every man a liar". How come Protestants so easily to
          receive them? by faith? Nay, I conceive that in most cases there is no
          submission of the reason at all; simply they are so familiar with the
          passages in question, that the narrative presents no difficulties to
          their imagination; they have nothing to overcome. If, however, they are
          led to contemplate these passages {206} in themselves, and to try them in
          the balance of probability, and to begin to question about them, as
          will happen when their intellect is cultivated, then there is nothing
          to bring them back to their former habitual or mechanical belief; they
          know nothing of submitting to authority, that is, they know nothing of
          faith; for they have no authority to submit to. They either remain in
          a state of doubt without any great trouble of mind, or they go on to
          ripen into utter disbelief on the subjects in question, though they
          may say nothing about it. Neither before they doubt, nor when they
          doubt, is there any token of the presence in them of a power
          subjecting reason to the Word of God. No; what looks like faith, is a
          mere hereditary persuasion, not a personal principle; it is a habit
          which they have learned in the nursery, which has never changed into
          anything higher, and which is scattered and disappears, like a mist,
          before the light, such as it is, of reason. If, however, there are
          Protestants, who are not in one or other of these two states, either
          of credulity or of doubt, but who firmly believe in spite of all
          difficulties, they certainly have some claim to be considered under
          the influence of faith; but there is nothing to show that such
          persons, where they are found, are not in the way to become Catholics,
          and perhaps they are already called so by their friends, showing in
          their own examples the logical, indisputable connexion which exists
          between possessing faith and joining the Church. If, then, faith be now the same faculty of mind, the same sort of
          habit or act, which it was in the days of {207} the Apostles, I have made
          good what I set about showing. But it must be the same; it cannot mean
          two things; the Word cannot have changed its meaning. Either say that
          faith is not necessary now at all, or take it to be what the Apostles
          meant by it, but do not say that you have it, and then show me
          something quite different, which you have put in the place of it. In
          the Apostles' days the peculiarity of faith was submission to a living
          authority; this is what made it so distinctive; this is what made it
          an act of submission at all; this is what destroyed private judgment
          in matters of religion. If you will not look out for a living
          authority, and will bargain for private judgment, then say at once
          that you have not Apostolic faith. And in fact you have it not; the
          bulk of this nation has it not; confess you have it not; and then
          confess that this is the reason why you are not Catholics. You are not
          Catholics because you have not faith. Why do not blind men see the
          sun? because they have no eyes; in like manner it is vain to discourse
          upon the beauty, the sanctity, the sublimity of the Catholic doctrine
          and worship, where men have no faith to accept it as Divine. They may
          confess its beauty, sublimity, and sanctity, without believing it;
          they may acknowledge that the Catholic religion is noble and majestic;
          they may be struck with its wisdom, they may admire its adaptation to
          human nature, they may be penetrated by its tender and winning
          bearing, they may be awed by its consistency. But to commit themselves
          to it, that is another matter; to choose it for their portion, to say
          with the favoured Moabitess, {208} "Whithersoever thou shalt go, I will
          go! and where thou shalt dwell, I will dwell; thy people shall be my
          people, and thy God my God," this is the language of faith. A man
          may revere, a man may extol, who has no tendency whatever to obey, no
          notion whatever of professing. And this often happens in fact: men are
          respectful to the Catholic religion; they acknowledge its services to
          mankind, they encourage it and its professors; they like to know them,
          they are interested in hearing of their movements, but they are not,
          and never will be Catholics. They will die as they have lived, out of
          the Church, because they have not possessed themselves of that faculty
          by which the Church is to be approached. Catholics who have not
          studied them or human nature, will wonder they remain where they are;
          nay, they themselves, alas for them! will sometimes lament they cannot
          become Catholics. They will feel so intimately the blessedness of
          being a Catholic, that they will cry out, "Oh, what would I give
          to be a Catholic! Oh, that I could believe what I admire! but I do
          not, and I can no more believe merely because I wish to do so, than I
          can leap over a mountain. I should be much happier were I a Catholic;
          but I am not; it is no use deceiving myself; I am what I am; I revere,
          I cannot accept." Oh, deplorable state! deplorable because it is utterly and
          absolutely their own fault, and because such great stress is laid in
          Scripture, as they know, on the necessity of faith for salvation.
          Faith is there made the foundation and commencement of all acceptable
          obedience. It is described as the "argument" or "proof
          {209} of things not seen"; by faith men have understood that God is,
          that He made the world, that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him,
          that the flood was coming, that their Saviour was to be born.
          "Without faith it is impossible to please God"; "by
          faith we stand"; "by faith we walk"; "by faith we
          overcome the world". When our Lord gave to the Apostles their
          commission to preach all over the world, He continued, "He that
          believeth and is baptised, shall be saved; but he that believeth not,
          shall be condemned". And He declared to Nicodemus, "He that
          believeth in the Son, is not judged; but he that doth not believe is
          already judged, because he believeth not in the Name of the
          Only-begotten Son of God". He said to the Pharisees, "If you
          believe not that I am He, ye shall die in your sins". To the
          Jews, "Ye believe not, because ye are not of My sheep". And
          you may recollect that before His miracles, He commonly demands faith
          of the supplicant: "All things are possible," He says,
          "to him that believeth"; and we find in one place, "He
          could not do any miracle," on account of the unbelief of the
          inhabitants. Has faith changed its meaning, or is it less necessary now? Is it
          not still what it was in the Apostles' day, the very characteristic of
          Christianity, the special instrument of renovation, the first
          disposition for justification, one out of the three theological
          virtues? God might have renewed us by other means, by sight, by
          reason, by love, but He has chosen to "purify our hearts by
          faith"; it has been His will to select an instrument which the
          world despises, but which is of {210} immense power. He preferred it, in His
          infinite wisdom, to every other; and if men have it not, they have not
          the very element and rudiment, out of which are formed, on which are
          built, the Saints and Servants of God. And they have it not; they are
          living, they are dying, without the hopes, without the aids of the
          Gospel, because, in spite of so much that is good in them, in spite of
          their sense of duty, their tenderness of conscience on many points,
          their benevolence, their uprightness, their generosity, they are under
          the dominion (I must say it) of a proud fiend; they have this stout
          spirit within them, they determine to be their own masters in matters
          of thought, about which they know so little; they consider their own
          reason better than any one's else; they will not admit that any one
          comes from God who contradicts their own view of truth. What! is none
          their equal in wisdom anywhere? is there none other whose word is to
          be taken on religion? is there none to wrest from them their ultimate
          appeal to themselves? Have they in no possible way the occasion or
          opportunity of faith? Is it a virtue, which, in consequence of their
          transcendent sagacity, their prerogative of omniscience, they must
          give up hope of exercising? If the pretensions of the Catholic Church
          do not satisfy them, let them go somewhere else, if they can. If they
          are so fastidious that they cannot trust her as the oracle of God, let
          them find another more certainly from Him than the House of His own
          institution, which has ever been called by His name, has ever
          maintained the same claims, has ever taught one substance of doctrine,
          {211} and has triumphed over those who preached any other. Since Apostolic
          faith was in the beginning reliance on man's word, as being God's
          word, since what faith was then such it is now, since faith is
          necessary for salvation, let them attempt to exercise it towards
          another, if they will not accept the Bride of the Lamb. Let them, if
          they can, put faith in some of those religions which have lasted a
          whole two or three centuries in a corner of the earth. Let them stake
          their eternal prospects on kings and nobles and parliaments and
          soldiery, let them take some mere fiction of the law, or abortion of
          the schools, or idol of a populace, or upstart of a crisis, or oracle
          of lecture-rooms, as the prophet of God. Alas! they are hardly bestead
          if they must possess a virtue, which they have no means of exercising,—if
          they must make an act of faith, they know not on whom, and know not
          why! What thanks ought we to render to Almighty God, my dear brethren,
          that He has made us what we are! It is a matter of grace. There are,
          to be sure, many cogent arguments to lead one to join the Catholic
          Church, but they do not force the will. We may know them, and not be
          moved to act upon them. We may be convinced without being persuaded.
          The two things are quite distinct from each other, seeing you ought to
          believe, and believing; reason, if left to itself, will bring you to
          the conclusion that you have sufficient grounds for believing, but
          belief is the gift of grace. You are then what you are, not from any
          excellence or merit of your own, but by the grace of God who has
          chosen you to believe. You might have {212} been as the barbarian of Africa,
          or the freethinker of Europe, with grace sufficient to condemn you,
          because it had not furthered your salvation. You might have had strong
          inspirations of grace and have resisted them, and then additional
          grace might not have been given to overcome your resistance. God gives
          not the same measure of grace to all. Has He not visited you with
          over-abundant grace? and was it not necessary for your hard hearts to
          receive more than other people? Praise and bless Him continually for
          the benefit; do not forget, as time goes on, that it is of grace; do
          not pride yourselves upon it; pray ever not to lose it; and do your
          best to make others partakers of it. And you, my brethren, also, if such be present, who are not as yet
          Catholics, but who by your coming hither seem to show your interest in
          our teaching, and you wish to know more about it, you too remember,
          that though you may not yet have faith in the Church, still God has
          brought you into the way of obtaining it. You are under the influence
          of His grace; He has brought you a step on your journey; He wishes to
          bring you further, He wishes to bestow on you the fulness of His
          blessings, and to make you Catholics. You are still in your sins;
          probably you are laden with the guilt of many years, the accumulated
          guilt of many a deep, mortal offence, which no contrition has washed
          away, and to which no Sacrament has been applied. You at present are
          troubled with an uneasy conscience, a dissatisfied reason, an unclean
          heart, and a divided will; you need to be converted. Yet now the first
          suggestions of grace are working in your souls, {213} and are to issue in
          pardon for the past and sanctity for the future. God is moving you to
          acts of faith, hope, love, hatred of sin, repentance; do not
          disappoint Him, do not thwart Him, concur with Him, obey Him. You look
          up, and you see, as it were, a great mountain to be scaled; you say,
          "How can I possibly find a path over these giant obstacles, which
          I find in the way of my becoming Catholic? I do not comprehend this
          doctrine, and I am pained at that; a third seems impossible; I never
          can be familiar with one practice, I am afraid of another; it is one
          maze and discomfort to me, and I am led to sink down in despair."
          Say not so, my dear brethren, look up in hope, trust in Him who calls
          you forward. "Who art thou, O great mountain, before Zorobabel?
          but a plain." He will lead you forward step by step, as He has
          led forward many a one before you. He will make the crooked straight
          and the rough plain. He will turn the streams, and dry up the rivers,
          which lie in your path. "He shall strengthen your feet like
          harts' feet, and set you up on high places. He shall widen your steps
          under you, and your tread shall not be weakened." "There is
          no God like the God of the righteous; He that mounts the heaven is thy
          Helper; by His mighty working the clouds disperse. His dwelling is
          above, and underneath are the everlasting arms; He shall cast out the
          enemy from before thee, and shall say, Crumble away." "The
          young shall faint, and youths shall fall; but they that hope in the
          Lord shall be new-fledged in strength, they shall take feathers like
          eagles, they shall run and not labour, they shall walk and not
          faint." Top | Contents | Works
          |  Home 
 Newman Reader  Works of John Henry NewmanCopyright © 2007 by The National Institute for Newman Studies. All rights reserved.
 |